RFR: 8295657: SA: Allow larger object alignments

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:04:49 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Found this when working on JOL support ([CODETOOLS-7903364](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/CODETOOLS-7903364)). If you try to attach to VM running with -XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=32, then SA would fail with:
> 
> 
> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Object alignment 32 not yet supported
> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.VM.<init>(VM.java:510)
> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.VM.initialize(VM.java:544)
> at jdk.hotspot.agent/sun.jvm.hotspot.HotSpotAgent.setupVM(HotSpotAgent.java:444)
> 
> 
> This code was added by [JDK-6916623](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6916623), but I don't see a reason why it should only handle 8 and 16 byte alignment.
> 
> Additional testing:
>  - [x] New regression test
>  - [x] Linux x86_64 fastdebug `serviceability/sa`
>     - default
>     - with `-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=16`
>     - with `-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=32`
>     - with `-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=64`
>     - with `-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=128`
>     - with `-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=256`

> The short test isn't really proof that SA works well with these alternate alignments. You really should try running all SA tests with `TEST_VM_OPTS=-XX:ObjectAlignmentInBytes=<n>` where is something other than 8 or 16.

As I stated in "Additional testing" in the PR description, I did ran `serviceability/sa` with different alignments. What other tests we should run?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10762