RFR: 8296089: Remove debug agent code for special handling of Thread.resume()
Chris Plummer
cjplummer at openjdk.org
Mon Oct 31 19:21:08 UTC 2022
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 19:08:14 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The debug agent sets a breakpoint in Thread.resume() so it can prevent the debugger from suspending threads while in the resume call:
>
> /*
> * Track the resuming thread by marking it as being within
> * a resume and by setting up for notification on
> * a frame pop or exception. We won't allow the debugger
> * to suspend threads while any thread is within a
> * call to resume. This (along with the block below)
> * ensures that when the debugger
> * suspends a thread it will remain suspended.
> */
> trackAppResume(resumer);
>
> Now that Thread.resume() is unsupported and just throws UnsupportedOperationException, all debug agent code related to this support can be removed. It's at least a couple of hundred lines of code, and with a fair amount of confusing synchronization. It will be nice to see it go.
>
> Also, there is a little bit of code to deal with the app calling Thread.suspend(). I'm a bit unsure of it's removal, because I'm not certain if we also need to consider another JVMTI agent doing a suspend. However, we don't seem to defend against another JVMTI agent resuming a thread, so maybe the debug agent is just not expected to work if another JVMTI agent interferes. I would appreciate some insight on this possibility. I've called out this code in the inlined review comments.
src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/threadControl.c line 741:
> 739: node->toBeResumed = JNI_TRUE;
> 740: }
> 741: JDI_ASSERT(error != JVMTI_ERROR_THREAD_SUSPENDED);
Should the original code remain in place because another JVMTI agent may have suspended the thread?
src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/threadControl.c line 952:
> 950: * won't suspend this thread after we are done with the resumeAll.
> 951: */
> 952: if (node->suspendCount == 1 && node->suspendOnStart) {
This is also related to Thread.suspend() and the previous comment I made above.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10922
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list