RFR: 8293613: need to properly handle and hide tmp VTMS transitions [v4]
Chris Plummer
cjplummer at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 23 21:00:47 UTC 2022
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:38:17 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiThreadState.cpp line 273:
>>
>>> 271:
>>> 272: assert(!thread->is_in_tmp_VTMS_transition(), "sanity check");
>>> 273: assert(!thread->is_in_VTMS_transition(), "VTMS_transition sanity check");
>>
>> Why not cover both of these with `!thread->is_in_any_VTMS_transition()`?
>
> It is to be clear what condition caused the assert as they are different beasts.
ok
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10321
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list