RFR: 8314694: Separate checked_cast from globalDefinitions.hpp
Thomas Stuefe
stuefe at openjdk.org
Tue Aug 22 06:57:28 UTC 2023
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 04:13:13 GMT, Kim Barrett <kbarrett at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review this change which moves checked_cast from globalDefinitions.hpp
> to a separate file. As part of this change we modify files that use
> checked_cast to directly include that new file. There are around 80 such
> files, and that change constitutes the majority of the changed files and lines
> in this PR.
>
> This PR doesn't fix the definition of checked_cast (see JDK-8314258). It just
> moves the existing definition to a new file, in preparation for fixing it
> later. (I'm running tests on a fixed implementation.)
>
> An alternative is to move checked_cast to a new file but have
> globalDefinitions.hpp include that new file. This would avoid touching the
> include lists of currently using files. It seems to me better to actually
> separate it.
>
> Fortunately, there was only one copyright update needed. Most of the uses were
> added recently as part of addressing -Wconversion warnings, so those files
> have already had copyright updates recently.
>
> The other change was to move pointer_delta_as_int next to the related
> pointer_delta, and change it to use a direct assert and static_cast, rather
> than checked_cast.
>
> With the exception of the simple change to pointer_delta_as_int the changes
> in this PR are very simple and almost mechanical. To find the files needing
> an additional include and to demonstrate completing that task, I applied this
> command to the hotspot directory:
>
>
> egrep -r --files-with-matches --exclude-dir=.git " checked_cast<" . | \
> xargs egrep --files-without-match "utilities/checkedCast.hpp"
>
>
> So perhaps this change is trivial, despite the number of files.
>
> Testing:
> mach5 tier1
Looks good.
Interesting how many of the touched cpp files did not include globalDefinitions.hpp.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by stuefe (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15377#pullrequestreview-1588580027
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list