RFR: 8300575: JVMTI support when using alternative virtual thread implementation [v2]

Patricio Chilano Mateo pchilanomate at openjdk.org
Wed Feb 15 01:22:35 UTC 2023


On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:20:30 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:

> The changes in the updates look good. I think the main thing to decide on is whether JavaThread:: _is_bound_vthread is needed or not. If GetCurrentThreadCpuTime is changed to allow an implementation support this function then it looks like the additional field would not be needed.
>
Great, thanks for looking at this Alan. I'll remove _is_bound_vthread if we change the specs for GetCurrentThreadCpuTime then.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12512


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list