Integrated: 8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint

Serguei Spitsyn sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 21 21:25:40 UTC 2023


On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:37:51 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:

> The rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock is better to be safepoint instead of nosafepoint.
> The fix includes removal of the function `check_vthread_and_suspend_at_safepoint` which is not needed anymore.
> 
> Testing:
> mach5 jobs are in progress:
>  Kitchensink, tiers1-6 (all JVMTI, JDWP, JDI and JDB tests have to be included)

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 46f25250
Author:    Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/46f25250bd49702fe18f9903473dc3e1cbe70f84
Stats:     55 lines in 6 files changed: 10 ins; 32 del; 13 mod

8299240: rank of JvmtiVTMSTransition_lock can be safepoint

Reviewed-by: dholmes, coleenp, pchilanomate

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12550


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list