RFR: JDK-8293114: JVM should trim the native heap [v4]
Thomas Stuefe
stuefe at openjdk.org
Thu Jul 6 15:25:03 UTC 2023
> This is a continuation of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085. I closed https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085 because it had accumulated too much comment history and got confusing. For a history of this issue, see previous discussions [1] and the comment section of 10085.
>
> ---------------
>
> This RFE adds the option to trim the Glibc heap periodically. This can recover a significant memory footprint if the VM process suffers from high-but-rare malloc spikes. It does not matter who causes the spikes: the JDK or customer code running in the JVM process.
>
> ### Background:
>
> The Glibc is reluctant to return memory to the OS. Temporary malloc spikes often carry over as permanent RSS increase. Note that C-heap retention is difficult to observe. Since it is freed memory, it won't appear in NMT; it is just a part of RSS.
>
> This is, effectively, caching - a performance tradeoff by the glibc. It makes a lot of sense with applications that cause high traffic on the C-heap. The JVM, however, clusters allocations and often rolls its own memory management based on virtual memory for many of its use cases.
>
> To manually trim the C-heap, Glibc exposes `malloc_trim(3)`. With JDK 18 [2], we added a new jcmd command to *manually* trim the C-heap on Linux (`jcmd System.trim_native_heap`). We then observed customers running this command periodically to slim down process sizes of container-bound jvms. That is cumbersome, and the JVM can do this a lot better - among other things because it knows best when *not* to trim.
>
> #### GLIBC internals
>
> The following information I took from the glibc source code and experimenting.
>
> ##### Why do we need to trim manually? Does the Glibc not trim on free?
>
> Upon `free()`, glibc may return memory to the OS if:
> - the returned block was mmap'ed
> - the returned block was not added to tcache or to fastbins
> - the returned block, possibly merged with its two immediate neighbors, had they been free, is larger than FASTBIN_CONSOLIDATION_THRESHOLD (64K) - in that case:
> a) for the main arena, glibc attempts to lower the brk()
> b) for mmap-ed heaps, glibc attempts to completely unmap or shrink the heap.
> In both cases, (a) and (b), only the top portion of the heap is reclaimed. "Holes" in the middle of other in-use chunks are not reclaimed.
>
> So: glibc *may* automatically reclaim memory. In normal configurations, with typical C-heap allocation granularity, it is unlikely.
>
> To increase the chance of auto-reclamation happening, one can do one or more t...
Thomas Stuefe has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
last cleanups and shade feedback
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14781/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14781/files/cd8c0f1b..9b47c64b
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14781&range=03
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14781&range=02-03
Stats: 7 lines in 3 files changed: 0 ins; 3 del; 4 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14781.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/14781/head:pull/14781
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14781
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list