RFR: JDK-8293114: JVM should trim the native heap [v10]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Fri Jul 14 08:47:25 UTC 2023
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:56:56 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stuefe at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This is a continuation of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085. I closed https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10085 because it had accumulated too much comment history and got confusing. For a history of this issue, see previous discussions [1] and the comment section of 10085.
>>
>> ---------------
>>
>> This RFE adds the option to trim the Glibc heap periodically. This can recover a significant memory footprint if the VM process suffers from high-but-rare malloc spikes. It does not matter who causes the spikes: the JDK or customer code running in the JVM process.
>>
>> ### Background:
>>
>> The Glibc is reluctant to return memory to the OS. Temporary malloc spikes often carry over as permanent RSS increase. Note that C-heap retention is difficult to observe. Since it is freed memory, it won't appear in NMT; it is just a part of RSS.
>>
>> This is, effectively, caching - a performance tradeoff by the glibc. It makes a lot of sense with applications that cause high traffic on the C-heap. The JVM, however, clusters allocations and often rolls its own memory management based on virtual memory for many of its use cases.
>>
>> To manually trim the C-heap, Glibc exposes `malloc_trim(3)`. With JDK 18 [2], we added a new jcmd command to *manually* trim the C-heap on Linux (`jcmd System.trim_native_heap`). We then observed customers running this command periodically to slim down process sizes of container-bound jvms. That is cumbersome, and the JVM can do this a lot better - among other things because it knows best when *not* to trim.
>>
>> #### GLIBC internals
>>
>> The following information I took from the glibc source code and experimenting.
>>
>> ##### Why do we need to trim manually? Does the Glibc not trim on free?
>>
>> Upon `free()`, glibc may return memory to the OS if:
>> - the returned block was mmap'ed
>> - the returned block was not added to tcache or to fastbins
>> - the returned block, possibly merged with its two immediate neighbors, had they been free, is larger than FASTBIN_CONSOLIDATION_THRESHOLD (64K) - in that case:
>> a) for the main arena, glibc attempts to lower the brk()
>> b) for mmap-ed heaps, glibc attempts to completely unmap or shrink the heap.
>> In both cases, (a) and (b), only the top portion of the heap is reclaimed. "Holes" in the middle of other in-use chunks are not reclaimed.
>>
>> So: glibc *may* automatically reclaim memory. In normal configurations, with typical C-heap allocation granularity, it is unlikely.
>>
>> To increase the ...
>
> Thomas Stuefe has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Bikeshed Trim log lines
test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/os/TestTrimNative.java line 285:
> 283: checkExpectedLogMessages(output, false, 0);
> 284: parseOutputAndLookForNegativeTrim(output, 0, 0);
> 285: output.shouldContain("Native trim not supported on this platform");
This needs updating - the current log output is:
Native heap trim is not supported on this platform
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14781#discussion_r1263360337
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list