[jdk21] RFR: 8300937: Update nroff pages in JDK 21 before RC
Daniel Fuchs
dfuchs at openjdk.org
Mon Jul 31 14:24:57 UTC 2023
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 08:33:07 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Main changes are to use 21 instead of 21-ea. In addition the following files contain additional updates from the closed sources:
>
> - src/java.base/share/man/java.1
>
> [JDK-8273131](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8273131): Update the java manpage markdown source for JFR filename expansion
> [JDK-8221633](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8221633): StartFlightRecording: consider moving mention of multiple comma-separated parameters to the front
>
> There are also some formatting differences related to:
>
> [JDK-8309670](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8309670): java -help output for --module-path / -p is incomplete
>
> Likely a different version of pandoc was used.
>
> - src/java.base/share/man/keytool.1
>
> [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool manpage contains a special character
>
> - src/jdk.compiler/share/man/javac.1
>
> [JDK-8308456](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308456): Update javac tool page for -proc:full
>
> also some formatting differences.
>
> - src/jdk.jartool/share/man/jarsigner.1
>
> [JDK-8303928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303928): Update jarsigner man page after [JDK-8303410](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303410)
>
> - src/jdk.jcmd/share/man/jcmd.1
>
> [JDK-8273131](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8273131): Update the java manpage markdown source for JFR filename expansion
>
> - src/jdk.jdeps/share/man/jdeps.1
>
> [JDK-8301207](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8301207): (jdeps) Deprecate jdeps -profile option
>
> - src/jdk.jfr/share/man/jfr.1
>
> Formatting changes.
>
> - src/jdk.jshell/share/man/jshell.1
>
> [JDK-8308988](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8308988): Update JShell manpage to include TOOLING description
Changes to jwebserver.1 look good to me.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/151#issuecomment-1658469731
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list