RFR: 8319935: Ensure only one JvmtiThreadState is created for one JavaThread associated with attached native thread [v5]
Daniel D. Daugherty
dcubed at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 29 23:09:16 UTC 2023
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 22:40:20 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jiangli at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review JvmtiThreadState::state_for_while_locked change to handle the state->get_thread_oop() null case. Please see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319935 for details.
>
> Jiangli Zhou has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Address Serguei Spitsyn's comments/suggestions:
> - Remove the redundant thread->is_Java_thread() check from JvmtiSampledObjectAllocEventCollector::object_alloc_is_safe_to_sample().
> - Change the assert in JvmtiThreadState::state_for_while_locked to avoid #ifdef ASSERT.
A belated thumbs up. Sorry I didn't get back to this review
before the fix was integrated.
I found just a nit comment that could be more clear.
src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiExport.cpp line 3143:
> 3141:
> 3142: // If the current thread is attaching from native and its Java thread object
> 3143: // is being allocated, things are not ready for allocation sampling.
nit - typo: s/is being allocated/has not been allocated/
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16642#pullrequestreview-1756369261
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16642#discussion_r1409970009
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list