RFR: 8345678: compute_modifiers should not be in create_mirror
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 9 04:31:38 UTC 2024
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 22:00:14 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
> This moves the modifier_flag computation to when InstanceKlass, ObjArrayKlass and TypeArrayKlass are created.
>
> Tested with jck:vm and tier1-4.
This seems reasonable, but I wonder if we can simplify things further for arrays - see below.
Future RFE: I also think we need to cleanup terminology i.e. "modifier flags" versus "access flags".
Thanks
src/hotspot/share/classfile/javaClasses.cpp line 1119:
> 1117: // to support Class.getModifiers(). Instance classes recalculate
> 1118: // the cached flags after the class file is parsed, but before the
> 1119: // class is put into the system dictionary.
Is this comment already out-of-date? I'm trying to see where the flags are recomputed after parsing.
src/hotspot/share/oops/typeArrayKlass.hpp line 76:
> 74: void copy_array(arrayOop s, int src_pos, arrayOop d, int dst_pos, int length, TRAPS);
> 75:
> 76: // jvm support
"jvm support" for what? I'm not even sure why we need `compute_modifier_flags` for array types when they have a fixed value. Can't we just hardwire them and only call `compute_modifier_flags` for instanceKlasses?
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22618#pullrequestreview-2487697138
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22618#discussion_r1875323314
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22618#discussion_r1875322865
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list