RFR: 8326583: Remove over-generalized DefineNativeToolchain solution [v4]

[Daniel Jeliński]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:19:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <ihse at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The idea of setting up general "toolchains" in the native build was good, but it turned out that we really only need a single toolchain, with a single twist: if it should use CC or CPP to link. This is better described by a specific argument to SetupNativeCompilation, LANG := C++ or LANG := C (the default).
>> 
>> There is a single exception to this rule, and that is if we want to compile for the build platform rather than the target platform. (This is only done for adlc) To keep expressing this difference, introduce TARGET_TYPE := BUILD (or TARGET_TYPE := TARGET, the default).
>> 
>> The final odd-case was the hack for building hsdis/bin on mingw. This can be resolved using direct variables to SetupNativeCompilation, instead of first creating a toolchain.
>> 
>> Doing this refactoring will simplify the SetupNativeCompilation code, and make it much clearer if we use the C or C++ linker.
>
> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains five commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into remove-toolchain-define
>  - Rename LANG to LINK_TYPE
>  - Reword "lib" comment to fit in better
>  - Merge branch 'master' into remove-toolchain-define
>  - 8326583: Remove over-generalized DefineNativeToolchain solution

FWIW, when I added `-lstdc++` before both `-static-libstdc++` and replaced LDCXX with LD, the code compiled and linked just fine.
Both GCC and G++ call the same linker, and the parameter differences are well documented. It's only a matter of deciding if we want to keep the complexity of selecting the executable to use or not.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17986#issuecomment-1966368056