RFR: 8072701: resume001 failed due to ERROR: timeout for waiting for a BreakpintEvent [v4]

Alex Menkov amenkov at openjdk.org
Mon Jul 15 19:09:52 UTC 2024


On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:08:26 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The test hits a breakpoint on thread2 with SUSPEND_EVENT_THREAD policy, so only thread2 is suspended. It then does a vm.suspend(), which suspends all threads and bumps the suspendCount of thread2 up to 2. It then does an eventSet.resume(), which decrements the thread2 suspendCount to 1, so now all threads are suspended with a suspendCount of 1. thread2 is then resumed and we expect to hit the next thread2 breakpoint. The problem is that thread2 can't hit the breakpoint until the main thread has proceeded far enough, and if the vm.suspend() that suspended the main thread happens too quickly, it won't have proceeded far enough, so thread2 never hits the breakpoint.
>> 
>> Essentially we need a vm.resume() to allow the main thread to run, but we need to do it in a way that does nullify part of what the test is testing for. So in order to allow the vm.resume() but not subvert the intent of the test, we first do a thread2.suspend() so the vm.resume() won't resume thread2.
>> 
>> Testing in progress: tier1 and tier5 svc testing
>
> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Remove extra space. Cleanup header println() in printThreadsInfo() since it is now general purpose and not just used when killing debuggee.

Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer).

Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20088#pullrequestreview-2178453387
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20088#pullrequestreview-2178456664


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list