RFR: JDK-8327769: jcmd GC.heap_dump without options should write to location given by -XX:HeapDumpPath, if set [v9]

Chris Plummer cjplummer at openjdk.org
Wed Mar 27 23:28:33 UTC 2024


On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:36:31 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaesken at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Sorry maybe it is maybe obvious for you but where should I open a "docs CR", would that be a separate JBS issue with Component name docs ?

You would file a JBS issue with component "docs" and subcategory "hotspot". But let's hold off on that for now until if it is decided if the PR is going to be pushed. My main reason for mentioning it was to point out additional fallout of this change.

> Should I include the HeapDumpGzipLevel in the same "docs CR" (but this might be bad for potential backporting) ?

Backporting also came to mind since the trouble shooting guide would need to be updated for each Oracle version this PR is backported to. And yes, HeapDumpGzipLevel docs need to match the actual implementation. I'm not sure if HeapDumpGzipLevel has been backported to 8, 11, and 17 (in the open for for the Oracle release).  I'm inclined to say a separate jbs issue should track updating docs for HeapDumpGzipLevel, but then we also have the question of whether or not HeapDumpGzipLevel should impact the jcmd if this PR is to be pushed.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18190#issuecomment-2024147551


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list