RFR: 8328083: degrade virtual thread support for GetObjectMonitorUsage

[Serguei Spitsyn]

On Wed, 1 May 2024 23:16:09 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Good suggestion, thanks. But it is more "incorrect". It should say "is waited by" instead of "is owned by":
>> 
>>            The number of platform threads waiting to own this monitor, or <code>0</code>
>>            if is waited by virtual threads only or no threads are waiting
>> ``` 
>> Are you okay with this correction?
>> Or maybe we should say:
>> 
>>            The number of platform threads waiting to own this monitor, or <code>0</code>
>>            if virtual threads only are waiting or no threads are waiting
>
> Copy and paste issue on my part. I would use "if only virtual threads".

Okay, thanks.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19030#discussion_r1586955071