RFR: 8341916: Remove ProtectionDomain related hotspot code and tests [v5]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Fri Nov 15 02:52:30 UTC 2024
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:02:56 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Remove Hotspot code that passes protection_domain around class loading so that checkPackageAccess can be called and the result stored. With the removal of the Security Manager in JEP 486, this code no longer does anything.
>>
>> Tested with tier1-4.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Purge last references to SecurityManager.
src/hotspot/share/classfile/javaClasses.cpp line 1617:
> 1615: macro(_holder_offset, k, "holder", thread_fieldholder_signature, false); \
> 1616: macro(_name_offset, k, vmSymbols::name_name(), string_signature, false); \
> 1617: macro(_contextClassLoader_offset, k, "contextClassLoader", classloader_signature, false); \
I didn't think the context class loader was related to SM in any way. ??
src/hotspot/share/logging/logDiagnosticCommand.hpp line 62:
> 60: }
> 61:
> 62: static const JavaPermission permission() {
Is any of this permission stuff still relevant? I couldn't figure out what ultimately looks at them. ??
src/hotspot/share/prims/jvm.cpp line 154:
> 152: */
> 153:
> 154: extern void trace_class_resolution(Klass* to_class) {
why `extern` ?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22064#discussion_r1843117025
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22064#discussion_r1843121894
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22064#discussion_r1843122642
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list