Integrated: 8339307: jhsdb jstack could not trace FFM upcall frame

[Yasumasa Suenaga]

On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:31:45 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuenaga at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This PR is successor of #20789 . I got some comments in there, then I needed to fix in many pooints. And also I have to fix branch name to kick GHA automatically (#20789 is named with `pr/`, it meets the condition to skip GHA). Hence I've opened another PR for this JBS issue.
> 
> This PR has been updated with about topics since #20789:
> * Use `JavaFrameAnchor` instead of raw frame pointer to unwind frame of `UpcallStub`.
> * The change happens x86 (includes AMD64), aarch64, PPC64, RISC-V 64 only - s390 is out of scope because SA does not have s390 implementation.
>     * Only both AMD64 and aarch64 have tested on GHA.
> * Refactor testcase to meet expected condition certainly.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: deeb09a6
Author:    Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuenaga at openjdk.org>
URL:       https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/deeb09a640bf693ea130d1283fc010c22f0cf9db
Stats:     447 lines in 12 files changed: 437 ins; 0 del; 10 mod

8339307: jhsdb jstack could not trace FFM upcall frame

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, jvernee

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20885