RFR: 8337563: NMT: rename MEMFLAGS to MemTag
Gerard Ziemski
gziemski at openjdk.org
Tue Sep 10 14:18:08 UTC 2024
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:57:08 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:
> > The template parameter rename I was planning on doing in a followup issue, however, if you really want, I can make the fix here too.
>
> Personally I'd be okay with doing it here as one final commit that can be viewed in isolation.
Sure, I can do it.
Is everyone OK with MT as the template parameter name? Another obvious choice is MEM_TAG
Side note: why are template parameter names all capitals? To help distinguish them from "regular" parameters? Do we still want that naming scheme, or can we switch here to using mem_tag?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20872#issuecomment-2340957192
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list