RFR: 8364638: Refactor and make accumulated GC CPU time code generic [v4]
Albert Mingkun Yang
ayang at openjdk.org
Tue Aug 12 11:56:19 UTC 2025
On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 09:49:12 GMT, Jonas Norlinder <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This PR refactors the newly added GC CPU time code from [JDK-8359110](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359110).
>>
>> As a stepping-stone to enable consolidation of CPU time tracking in e.g. hsperf counters and GCTraceCPUTime and to have a unified interface for tracking CPU time of various components in Hotspot this code can be refactored. This PR introduces a new interface to retrieve CPU time for various Hotspot components and it currently supports:
>>
>> CPUTimeUsage::GC::total() // the sum of gc_threads(), vm_thread(), stringdedup()
>>
>> CPUTimeUsage::GC::gc_threads()
>> CPUTimeUsage::GC::vm_thread()
>> CPUTimeUsage::GC::stringdedup()
>>
>> CPUTimeUsage::Runtime::vm_thread()
>>
>>
>> I moved `CPUTimeUsage` to `src/hotspot/share/services` since it seemed fitting as it housed similar performance tracking code like `RuntimeService`, as this is no longer a class that is only specific to GC.
>>
>> I also made a minor improvement in the CPU time logging during exit. Since `CPUTimeUsage` supports more components than just GC I changed the logging flag to from `gc,cpu` to `cpu` and created a detailed table:
>>
>>
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] === CPU time Statistics =============================================================
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] CPUs
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] s % utilized
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] Process
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] Total 1616.3627 100.00 22.6
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] VM Thread 5.2992 0.33 0.1
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] Garbage Collection 83.7322 5.18 1.2
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] GC Threads 82.7671 5.12 1.2
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] VM Thread 0.9651 0.06 0.0
>> [71.425s][info][cpu ] =====================================================================================
>>
>>
>> Additionally, if CPU time retrieval fails it should not be the caller's responsibility to log warnings as this would bloat the code unnecessarily. I've noticed that `os` does log a warning for some methods if they fail so I continued on this path.
>
> Jonas Norlinder has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Improve robustness
src/hotspot/os/linux/os_linux.cpp line 4953:
> 4951: // to detach itself from the VM - which should result in ESRCH.
> 4952: assert_status(rc == ESRCH, rc, "pthread_getcpuclockid failed");
> 4953: log_warning(os)("Could not sample thread CPU time");
Maybe diff msgs can be printed so that we know better what went wrong if `-1` is returned.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/collectedHeap.cpp line 610:
> 608: }
> 609:
> 610: double calc_usage(double component_cpu_time, double process_cpu_time) {
Could `percent_of` be used instead?
src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/collectedHeap.cpp line 627:
> 625:
> 626: LogTarget(Info, cpu) cpuLog;
> 627: if (cpuLog.is_enabled()) {
Can use early-return to reduce one indentation level.
src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/collectedHeap.hpp line 468:
> 466: virtual void gc_threads_do(ThreadClosure* tc) const = 0;
> 467:
> 468: jlong elapsed_gc_cpu_time() const;
Seems unused.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26621#discussion_r2269575257
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26621#discussion_r2269582730
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26621#discussion_r2269586175
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26621#discussion_r2269589768
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list