RFR: 8364343: Virtual Thread transition management needs to be independent of JVM TI [v4]

Coleen Phillimore coleenp at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 1 19:17:06 UTC 2025


On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 07:33:10 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This could be a simple cleanup of all these occurrences later.
>
> Yes this is terribly obscure (doing the assignment in the loop condition check - surprised that is even allowed) and also violates the style-guide in relation to implicit booleans. But frankly it is an awful use of a for-loop in my opinion.

Filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372840 as a cleanup task.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28361#discussion_r2578305847


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list