RFR: 8364343: Virtual Thread transition management needs to be independent of JVM TI [v11]
Patricio Chilano Mateo
pchilanomate at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 2 20:20:32 UTC 2025
On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:46:20 GMT, Alan Bateman <alanb at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I renamed the methods as suggested. I remembered that we separated ThreadStart/ThreadEnd in 8306028 for future improvements related to JVMTI. Not sure if that’s still relevant but in any case probably better to leave that discussion for a separate bug.
>
> Given the comment block to define the terms "mount transition" and "unmount transition" then we could go a bit further and make it 6 methods: start/endMountTransition, start/endUnmountTransition, endFirstMountTransition and startLastUnmountTransition. We don't have to do it now, but it would make the use-sites clearer I think.
Sounds good, filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372953.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28361#discussion_r2582659743
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list