RFR: 8374232: Comment cleanup in diagnosticCommand.cpp
Kevin Walls
kevinw at openjdk.org
Tue Dec 23 17:16:53 UTC 2025
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:56:05 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Comment-only cleanup, didn't spot during previous review.
>>
>> Trivial, no code affected.
>
> src/hotspot/share/services/diagnosticCommand.cpp line 97:
>
>> 95: // Registration of the diagnostic commands.
>> 96: // Argument specifies to which interfaces a command is made available,
>> 97: // can also specify if hidden from jcmd help.
>
> I kind a liked the "first argument, second argument" approach a bit more.
>
> // First argument specifies on which interfaces a command is made available.
> // Optional second argument specifies if hidden from jcmd help. Default is false.
OK thanks.
I was thinking as all the usages here only use one argument, the numbering seems irrelevant.
The flags/mask of sources is maybe unusual enough that it's worth keeping the comment.
I almost didn't even mention the hidden flag, you go and find the constructor DCmdFactoryImpl(uint32_t flags, bool hidden = false) when clarification is needed.
Any thoughts on if it's worth mentioning?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28962#discussion_r2643824988
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list