RFR: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native [v2]

Dean Long dlong at openjdk.org
Wed Feb 5 21:43:14 UTC 2025


On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:43:51 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The Class.getModifiers() method is implemented as a native method in java.lang.Class to access a field that we've calculated when creating the mirror.  The field is final after that point. The VM doesn't need it anymore, so there's no real need for the jdk code to call into the VM to get it.  This moves the field to Java and removes the intrinsic code.  I promoted the compute_modifiers() functions to return int since that's how java.lang.Class uses the value.  It should really be an unsigned short though.
>> 
>> There's a couple of JMH benchmarks added with this change.  One does show that for array classes for non-bootstrap class loader, this results in one extra load which in a long loop of just that, is observable.  I don't think this is real life code. The other benchmarks added show no regression.
>> 
>> Tested with tier1-8.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix copyright and param name

src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp line 2458:

> 2456:           return TypePtr::NULL_PTR;
> 2457:         }
> 2458:         // ???

I suspect that we still need this code to support intrinsics like LibraryCallKit::inline_native_classID() and maybe other users of this field, but the comment below no longer makes sense.

src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp line 2459:

> 2457:         }
> 2458:         // ???
> 2459:         // (Folds up the 1st indirection in aClassConstant.getModifiers().)

Suggestion:

        // Fold up the load of the hidden field

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22652#discussion_r1943695585
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22652#discussion_r1943696867


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list