RFR: 8349088: De-virtualize Codeblob and nmethod [v2]
Chris Plummer
cjplummer at openjdk.org
Mon Feb 10 03:29:13 UTC 2025
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 02:47:58 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Vladimir Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix Zero and Minimal VM builds
>
> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/code/CodeCache.java line 38:
>
>> 36: public class CodeCache {
>> 37: private static GrowableArray<CodeHeap> heapArray;
>> 38: private static VirtualConstructor virtualConstructor;
>
> What is the reason for switching from the virtualConstructor/hashMap approach to using getClassFor()? The hashmap is the model for JavaThread, MetaData, and CollectedHeap subtypes.
I think I found the answer. Since there is no longer a vtable, TypeDataBase.addressTypeIsEqualToType() will no longer work for Codeblobs. I was wondering if the lack of a vtable might have some negative impact. Glad to see you found a solution. I hope the lack of a vtable does not creep in elsewhere. I know it will have some negative impact on things like the "findpc" functionality, which will no longer be able to tell the user that an address points to a Codeblob instance. There's no test for this, but users might run across it.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23533#discussion_r1948352958
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list