RFR: 8350287: Cleanup SA's support for CodeBlob subclasses

Chris Plummer cjplummer at openjdk.org
Wed Feb 19 04:34:53 UTC 2025


On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 03:14:49 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov <kvn at openjdk.org> wrote:

> > Basically for these 3 CodeBlob types getName() will no longer include the CodeBlob type.
> 
> I think this is fine: output is informative enough to figure out type of blob. Please check SA tests if they look for old output.

The tests are all passing.

> src/jdk.hotspot.agent/share/classes/sun/jvm/hotspot/code/RuntimeStub.java line 47:
> 
>> 45:   private static void initialize(TypeDataBase db) {
>> 46:     Type type = db.lookupType("RuntimeStub");
>> 47:     callerMustGCArgumentsField = type.getCIntegerField("_caller_must_gc_arguments");
> 
> This field is in `CodeBlob` since JDK 23 [JDK-8329433](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329433) https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/share/code/codeBlob.hpp#L126

Ah, right. I forgot you had mentioned that. I think that means I can rid of RuntimeStub and RuntimeBlob once this code is moved to CodeBlob.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23684#issuecomment-2667484513
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23684#discussion_r1960935263


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list