RFR: 8192647: GClocker induced GCs can starve threads requiring memory leading to OOME [v4]
Albert Mingkun Yang
ayang at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 25 11:17:06 UTC 2025
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:20:57 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ayang at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Here is an attempt to simplify GCLocker implementation for Serial and Parallel.
>>
>> GCLocker prevents GC when Java threads are in a critical region (i.e., calling JNI critical APIs). JDK-7129164 introduces an optimization that updates a shared variable (used to track the number of threads in the critical region) only if there is a pending GC request. However, this also means that after reaching a GC safepoint, we may discover that GCLocker is active, preventing a GC cycle from being invoked. The inability to perform GC at a safepoint adds complexity -- for example, a caller must retry allocation if the request fails due to GC being inhibited by GCLocker.
>>
>> The proposed patch uses a readers-writer lock to ensure that all Java threads exit the critical region before reaching a GC safepoint. This guarantees that once inside the safepoint, we can successfully invoke a GC cycle. The approach takes inspiration from `ZJNICritical`, but some regressions were observed in j2dbench (on Windows) and the micro-benchmark in [JDK-8232575](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8232575). Therefore, instead of relying on atomic operations on a global variable when entering or leaving the critical region, this PR uses an existing thread-local variable with a store-load barrier for synchronization.
>>
>> Performance is neutral for all benchmarks tested: DaCapo, SPECjbb2005, SPECjbb2015, SPECjvm2008, j2dbench, and CacheStress.
>>
>> Test: tier1-8
>
> Albert Mingkun Yang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into gclocker
> - review
> - Merge branch 'master' into gclocker
> - review
> - Merge branch 'master' into gclocker
> - review
> - Merge branch 'master' into gclocker
> - gclocker
Thanks for review.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23367#issuecomment-2681608369
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list