RFR: 8346990: Remove INTX_FORMAT and UINTX_FORMAT macros [v2]

[Kim Barrett]

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:21:14 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I have to confess that I have no idea what this is trying to show.  I'd rather have all the UINTX_FORMAT purged and not leave a remnant for these two special cases.  A function whose name describes what this is trying to show would be better.
>
> @theRealAph added this with the secondary super cache work, but I think it may have also been meant to be zx because of the leading 0x.  So INTPTR_FORMAT would also work.

I don't think we should be mixing uintx types and UINTPTR_FORMAT like that.  As I said earlier, this is one that
I think probably ought not be changed at all.  I think some of the FORMAT macros are useful to avoid inline
format directives that resemble line noise, or ugly conditionals like that.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22916#discussion_r1905076840