Remote debugging should print warning when binding to external address

Aleksei Ivanov alexey.ivanov at oracle.com
Mon Jan 20 20:47:58 UTC 2025


On 2025-01-20 20:36, some-java-user-99206970363698485155 at vodafonemail.de 
wrote:
> Thanks for the information! Though I cannot see the report. Is it 
> still pending review / evaluation or was it made private to hide 
> information? Is it still open or was it resolved as "Won't fix" or 
> similar?

Yes, the bug is marked confidential. I didn't notice it right away.

It is open.

> It seems I wasn't informed that the report had been created; at least 
> I cannot find the confirmation mail for it. Note that I had specified 
> a different private contact e-mail address.

It's because the bug isn't public.

> Note: I am dropping serviceability-dev at openjdk.org from CC now. I had 
> originally included it because I thought it might have been better 
> fitting for this mail, but I didn't get a confirmation mail for the 
> list subscription, so I wasn't sure whether the mail would go through.

This discussion belongs on serviceability-dev at openjdk.org. It's 
discuss at openjdk.org that should be dropped.

> 20.01.2025, 21:16 Aleksei Ivanov:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Your bug report exists in JBS: 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329414
>>
>> On 2025-01-20 20:07, 
>> some-java-user-99206970363698485155 at vodafonemail.de wrote:
>>> Side note: I am rather certain I had also reported this on the JDK 
>>> bug tracker through https://bugreport.java.com quite a while ago 
>>> (unless I am misremembering this) also referring to the IDEA bug 
>>> report IDEA-349570 in the description, but it seems the JDK bug 
>>> report was never created and I never got a response (?). See also my 
>>> general concerns with the current bug reporting in 
>>> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/web-discuss/2022-January/000593.html. 
>>>
-- 
Regards,
Alexey


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list