RFR: 8284016: Normalize handshake closure names [v4]

[Coleen Phillimore]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 09:39:22 GMT, Anton Artemov <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi, please consider the following changes:
>> 
>> There are many classes inherited from the `HandshakeClosure` class, but they do not follow the same naming convention. In this PR we address this issue, all names are normalized in the following way:
>> 
>> `XXXDummyClassNameClosure -> XXXDummyClassNameHandshakeClosure`
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> `XXXDummyClassNameHandshake -> XXXDummyClassNameHandshakeClosure`
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> `XXXStrangeClassName -> SomewhatSimilarNameHandshakeClosure`
>> 
>> Tested in GHA and tiers 1 - 3.
>
> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8284016: Addressed reviewer's comments

Still looks good.  So the pattern is that something that inherits directly from HandshakeClosure is TheThingHandshakeClosure and in the case of JVMTI further inheritance has a shorter name.  Seems fine.  So many handshakes!

-------------

Marked as reviewed by coleenp (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26014#pullrequestreview-2974982990