RFR: 8309399: JVMTI spec needs to clarify when OPAQUE_FRAME is thrown for reasons other than a native method

Alan Bateman alanb at openjdk.org
Fri Jul 4 06:18:40 UTC 2025


On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 15:31:28 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Then should we say this way: "unable to set a `FramePop` event for the frame" ?

The can_generate_frame_pop_events capability uses "Can set .." so I think what you propose is good. Also the temptation may be to use the word "enable" where but that risks getting confused with enabling events.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26111#discussion_r2184504203


More information about the serviceability-dev mailing list