RFR: 8369994: Mixed mode jhsdb jstack cannot resolve symbol in function ending in call [v3]

[Yasumasa Suenaga]

On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:32:46 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuenaga at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> `jhsdb jstack --mixed` with coredump cannot resolve function symbol which has `.cold` attribute.
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------- 120485 -----------------
>> "Thread-0" #24 prio=5 tid=0x00007f50dc1aa7c0 nid=120485 waiting on condition [0x00007f50c0d1a000]
>>    java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping)
>>    JavaThread state: _thread_blocked
>> 0x00007f50e4710735 __GI_abort + 0x8b
>> 0x00007f50e1e01f33 ????????
>> 
>> 
>> 0x7f50e1e01f33 was `os::abort(bool, void const*, void const*) [clone .cold]` and I could see it in GDB. However it has `.cold` suffix, it means the code has been relocated as ["cold" function](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-cold-function-attribute). In GDB, we can see the code in another area from function body as following:
>> 
>> 
>> (gdb) disas 0x7f50e1e01f2e, 0x7f50e1e01f34
>> Dump of assembler code from 0x7f50e1e01f2e to 0x7f50e1e01f34:
>>    0x00007f50e1e01f2e <_ZN2os5abortEbPKvS1_.cold+0>: call 0x7f50e1e01010 <abort at plt>
>> => 0x00007f50e1e01f33: nop
>> End of assembler dump.
>> 
>> 
>> libsaproc.so checks address range to resolve symbol whether the address is in between `start` and `start + size - 1`. As you can see in assembler dump, the code in `.cold` section is `call` instruction, thus IP points next `nop`, thus we should allow address range between `start` and `start + size`.
>> 
>> After this PR, you can see the right symbol as following:
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------- 120485 -----------------
>> "Thread-0" #24 prio=5 tid=0x00007f50dc1aa7c0 nid=120485 waiting on condition [0x00007f50c0d1a000]
>>    java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (sleeping)
>>    JavaThread state: _thread_blocked
>> 0x00007f50e4710735      __GI_abort + 0x8b
>> 0x00007f50e1e01f33      os::abort(bool, void const*, void const*) [clone .cold] + 0x5
>
> Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Clarify comment about RIP-1 fallback handling

Thank you both for reviewing!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27846#issuecomment-3475467698