RFR: 8366659: ObjectMonitor::wait() can deadlock with a suspension request [v4]
Serguei Spitsyn
sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Tue Nov 11 11:18:49 UTC 2025
On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:21:11 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 18 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8366659-OM-wait-suspend-deadlock
>> - 8366659: Added a comment to a boolean arg for enter()
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8366659-OM-wait-suspend-deadlock
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8366659-OM-wait-suspend-deadlock
>> - 8366659: Fixed new lines.
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8366659-OM-wait-suspend-deadlock
>> - 8366659: Removed incorrect assert,
>> - 8366659: Fixed merge conflict
>> - 8366659: Fixed whitespace.
>> - 8366659: Disabled posting JVMTI events in reenter-etner path of wait. Postponed waited event.
>> - ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/79fee607...31482ba4
>
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp line 1108:
>
>> 1106: assert(currentNode->_thread == current, "invariant");
>> 1107: assert(_waiters > 0, "invariant");
>> 1108: assert_mark_word_consistency();
>
> Why remove call to `assert_mark_word_consistency();`?
Same question from me. :)
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp line 1186:
>
>> 1184: // Current has acquired the lock -- Unlink current from the _entry_list.
>> 1185: assert(has_owner(current), "invariant");
>> 1186: assert_mark_word_consistency();
>
> Why remove call to `assert_mark_word_consistency();`?
Same question from me. :)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#discussion_r2513824738
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#discussion_r2513824235
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list