RFR: 8368159: Significant performance overhead when started with jdwp agent and unattached debugger [v2]
Chris Plummer
cjplummer at openjdk.org
Wed Sep 24 05:04:14 UTC 2025
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:25:19 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspitsyn at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> It seems odd to me that a method called invalidate_jvmti_stack() sometimes doesn't invalidate the stack. Even before this change it was not invalidating unless it was in interp_only mode, which also seems odd. If the cached value is not used for compiled frames, why bother with the interp_only check?
>>
>> I can rename this function to `cond_ invalidate_jvmti_stack()` if you want. The `interp_only` check is needed for optimization to avoid a performance overhead of current stack depth invalidation.
>
> I was thinking a lot on how to get rid of this current stack depth recalculation mechanism used in `interp_only` mode but have not come with a good approach yet. We have a constant trouble from this mechanism needed for debugger optimization purposes.
> The interp_only check is needed for optimization to avoid a performance overhead of current stack depth invalidation.
But if we are not in interp_only mode isn't it already invalidated?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27403#discussion_r2374345062
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list