RFR: 8374372: Move OSX Serviceability Agent to macosx namespace

[Harald Eilertsen]

On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 19:58:00 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplummer at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> > Both the SA and hotspot os/bsd directories.
>>> 
>>> So what are your plans with the os/bsd directory? Rename it to something like os/darwin or os/macos, strip it of support that doesn't apply to macos, and then create a new os/bsd directory in your bsd project repo that only applies to a true bsd port.
>> 
>> If that's acceptable to the project, I think that it would be a good idea long term. In the short term, we're just trying to get the port working with as little disruption to upstream as possible.
>
>> If that's acceptable to the project, I think that it would be a good idea long term. In
> If those are your plans with os/bsd, I think before doing these changes to SA you should also hash out and get buy-in for the proposed changes to os/bsd. The SA changes are somewhat disruptive and need to be well thought out before we proceed.
> 
>> In the short term, we're just trying to get the port working with as little disruption to upstream as possible.
> What would be the least disruptive would be to directly fix the existing BSD port without the proposed restructuring. Any idea why the recent changes broke the BSD port and how hard (and possibly disruptive) it would be to fix.

@plummercj Ok, will do that. Thanks for the feedback!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29003#issuecomment-3725724121