RFC: JVMTI async stack-walker POC
Alan Bateman
alan.bateman at oracle.com
Tue Jan 13 17:11:27 UTC 2026
On 13/01/2026 11:19, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> following up with discussions that took place between various folks from Oracle, Amazon, SAP and Datadog, I would like to propose two proof-of-concepts for a JVMTI async stack-walker API. Those are by no means complete implementations, but are meant to serve as a basis for further discussions.
>
I see both PoCs propose standard APIs. JVMTI is Java SE and VM
independent so would be problematic to have normative reference to "JFR"
in the spec. Once you converge on a direction then it would be
interesting to see if it could be exposed using the JVMTI extension
mechanism as that would give you flexibility to make available
JDK-specific features
-Alan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/serviceability-dev/attachments/20260113/ac2540a6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the serviceability-dev
mailing list