RFR: Correctly iterate references in humongous regions
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Sat Apr 1 12:07:59 UTC 2017
Good to me.
-Zhengyu
On 04/01/2017 06:41 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> Am 31.03.2017 um 21:41 schrieb Zhengyu Gu:
>>
>>
>> On 03/31/2017 09:40 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>> Am 31.03.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Aleksey Shipilev:
>>>> On 03/31/2017 12:50 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/oop-iterate-humongous/webrev.00/
>>>> This makes me a little itchy:
>>>>
>>>> 547 while (! region->is_humongous_start()) {
>>>> 548 region = _ordered_regions->get(region->region_number() - 1);
>>>> 549 }
>>>>
>>>> Rewind could use a simple local var?
>>>
>>> Yeap.
>>>
>>> I also noticed that I haven't done the version with limit yet. I made up
>>> my mind about this, and realized that we don't really want iteration up
>>> to arbitrary limits: this is meant to be used specifically with the
>>> concurrent-iteration-safe-limit, and should say so in the API. I changed
>>> those methods to include 'safe_iterate' (consistent with Space's
>>> safe_iterate() methods), and put the actual impls into private methods
>>> that take the upper limit.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/oop-iterate-humongous/webrev.00/
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/oop-iterate-humongous/webrev.00/>
>>>
>>> Good now?
>>
>> It seems that you have yet address what Aleksey suggested.
>
> Oops, it seems like I posted the wrong webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/oop-iterate-humongous/webrev.02/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erkennke/oop-iterate-humongous/webrev.02/>
>
> Roman
>
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list