Shenandoah WB and tableswitch
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Fri Dec 22 13:29:55 UTC 2017
On 12/22/2017 01:44 PM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
>
> Here is a WIP patch if you want to give it a try:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/shenandoah/predicate%2btableswitch.patch
Very good! Our most targeted benchmark:
# WriteBarrierTableSwitch.separate
Parallel: 1227 ± 9 ns/op
Shenandoah baseline, -WB: 1663 ± 1 ns/op
Shenandoah patched, -WB: 1081 ± 5 ns/op
Shenandoah baseline, +WB: 1839 ± 1 ns/op
Shenandoah patched, +WB: 1169 ± 1 ns/op // +57% better
...which was the minimized version of:
# ObjectInputStream read test
Parallel: 10981 ± 32 ns/op
Shenandoah baseline, -WB: 10256 ± 206 ns/op
Shenandoah patched, -WB: 10589 ± 247 ns/op
Shenandoah baseline, +WB: 12890 ± 414 ns/op
Shenandoah patched, +WB: 11153 ± 209 ns/op // +15% better
...which was the minimized version of:
# Serial
Parallel: 2646 ± 2 ops/s
Shenandoah baseline, -WB: 2591 ± 32 ops/s
Shenandoah patched, -WB: 2553 ± 33 ops/s
Shenandoah baseline, +WB: 2269 ± 30 ops/s
Shenandoah patched, +WB: 2355 ± 35 ops/s // +4% better
-Aleksey
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list