On 09/06/2017 03:58 PM, Roman Kennke wrote: > OK, I will put it back in. It will all change with the GC interface anyway... > >> *) ShenandoahSATBBarrier should be handled in >> ShenandoahBarrierSet::keep_alive_barrier? Seems fine with me. ShenandoahSATBBarrier can be just renamed for this, right? -Aleksey