RFR: Merge remaining jdk11
Roman Kennke
rkennke at redhat.com
Fri Jun 8 16:48:11 UTC 2018
Please push that. We need to carefully check a couple of places (ref-proc, cleanup, etc) anyway. Thanks for looking into it.
Are we implementing/using the conc cleanup stuff already?
Thanks, Roman
Am 8. Juni 2018 18:42:46 MESZ schrieb Zhengyu Gu <zgu at redhat.com>:
>
>
>On 06/08/2018 11:31 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> Thanks!
>> I've pushed a minor release build fix after the fact. It was not
>> committed to the merge changeset when I pushed the main batch. Please
>> have a look at the concurrentHashMap issue ASAP.
>
>Looks like that it still tries to rehash the string table at
>safepoints,
>which defeats the purpose of concurrent cleanup ...
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/shenandoah/stringtable_no_par_cleanup/webrev.00/
>Seems to fix that. But this looks like an upstream bug (?) Do we know
>if
>there is a reported one? I will try to create a reproducer for upstream
>...
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Zhengyu
>
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>> Ok!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>> On 06/08/2018 10:36 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>> This merges from jdk/jdk up to:
>>>>
>>>> changeset: 50805:ec70aad8aebe
>>>> user: simonis
>>>> date: Fri Jun 08 10:22:26 2018 +0200
>>>> summary: 8204335: [ppc] Assembler::add_const_optimized
>incorrect for
>>>> some inputs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There've only been smallish stuff, and a bunch of improvements that
>I
>>>> pushed to upstream meanwhile.
>>>>
>>>> Testing looks good, except that StringInternCleanup.java appears to
>>>> trigger a bug in concurrentHashMap when run from fastdebug. I hope
>>>> Zhengyu can look at that?
>>>>
>>>> List of changesets:
>>>>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/upstream-merge-2018-06-08/outgoing.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok?
>>>>
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>
>>
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list