RFR: Fix references to G1SATBMarkQueueSet

[Roman Kennke]

Ok. Thanks!
Roman



> PPC64/S390x builds are failing because they do not account rename SATBMarkQueueSet ->
> G1SATBMarkQueueSet.
> 
> Fix:
> 
> diff -r 32458bd6e3dc src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_ppc.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_ppc.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:24:03 2018 +0200
> +++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/ppc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_ppc.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:34:12 2018 +0200
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@
>    __ mflr(R0);
>    __ std(R0, _abi(lr), R1_SP);
>    __ push_frame_reg_args(nbytes_save, R0); // dummy frame for C call
> -  __ call_VM_leaf(CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address, SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
> R16_thread);
> +  __ call_VM_leaf(CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address, G1SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
> R16_thread);
>    __ pop_frame();
>    __ ld(R0, _abi(lr), R1_SP);
>    __ mtlr(R0);
> diff -r 32458bd6e3dc src/hotspot/cpu/s390/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_s390.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_s390.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:24:03 2018 +0200
> +++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_s390.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:34:12 2018 +0200
> @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@
>    __ bind(refill);
>    save_volatile_registers(sasm);
>    __ z_lgr(tmp, pre_val); // save pre_val
> -  __ call_VM_leaf(CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address, SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
> +  __ call_VM_leaf(CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address, G1SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
>                    Z_thread);
>    __ z_lgr(pre_val, tmp); // restore pre_val
>    restore_volatile_registers(sasm);
> diff -r 32458bd6e3dc src/hotspot/cpu/sparc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_sparc.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/cpu/sparc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_sparc.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:24:03 2018 +0200
> +++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/sparc/gc/g1/g1BarrierSetAssembler_sparc.cpp	Tue Jun 12 09:34:12 2018 +0200
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
> 
>    address handle_zero =
>      CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address,
> -                     &SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread);
> +                     &G1SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread);
>    // This should be rare enough that we can afford to save all the
>    // scratch registers that the calling context might be using.
>    __ mov(G1_scratch, L0);
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@
> 
>    __ call_VM_leaf(L7_thread_cache,
>                    CAST_FROM_FN_PTR(address,
> -                                   SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
> +                                   G1SATBMarkQueueSet::handle_zero_index_for_thread),
>                                     G2_thread);
> 
>    __ restore_live_registers(true);
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey
>