RFR: Fix assert in ShenandoahTraversalGC
Aleksey Shipilev
shade at redhat.com
Tue Jun 26 17:27:32 UTC 2018
On 06/26/2018 07:25 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> We've got one assert wrong.
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User rkennke
> # Date 1530033876 -7200
> # Tue Jun 26 19:24:36 2018 +0200
> # Node ID 44f9dc08c064abe8cc91650961fdabcafd45c993
> # Parent b1bc743e67843a53b6c77f058bbbceff139883d6
> [mq]: fixassert.patch
>
> diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahTraversalGC.cpp
> b/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahTraversalGC.cpp
> --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahTraversalGC.cpp
> +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahTraversalGC.cpp
> @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@
> &complete_gc, &yield,
> NULL);
> }
> - assert(!sh->cancelled_gc() || task_queues()->is_empty(), "Should be
> empty");
> + assert(sh->cancelled_gc() || task_queues()->is_empty(), "Should be
> empty");
> }
>
> // Weak Reference Closures
>
>
> If approved, I'll push it to both sh/jdk and sh/jdk10
>
> Ok?
Yes, please do.
-Aleksey
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list