RFR: Upstreaming OWST task termination (Shenandoah changes)

[Zhengyu Gu]

On 11/27/18 2:29 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> I think the changes look good.
> 
> I'm wondering if we should push it to upstream first, then cherry-pick
> the change ASAP and add the Shenandoah pieces then. This seems the least
> disruptive path. Upstream may want stuff changed around, and from there
> it gets messy...

Yes, my intention is to upstream first. I did this patch to make sure 
that upstreamed patch works with our force termination stuff ...

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

> 
> Roman
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review Shenandoah changes that will be affected by JDK-8204947.
>> Also, please take a look of OWSTTaskTerminator, see if there are any
>> faults.
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/shenandoah/upstream_owst/webrev.00/index.html
>>
>>
>> Test:
>>    tier3_gc_shenandoah (fastdebug and release)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>