RFR(XXS) 8222188: Shenandoah: Adjust Shenandoah work gang types
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 14:59:37 UTC 2019
On 4/9/19 10:19 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 4/9/19 4:13 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> This is a cleanup in preparation for concurrent class unloading.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222188
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8222188/webrev.00/index.html
>
> OK. Changing _safepoint_workers to be GC_Task_threads does not violate correctness?
Reverted this part.
Was following G1, but ZGC setup the same way as we do. I guess that
shared code does not depends on this property.
>
> Nits:
>
> *) Changeset synopsis is odd?
> "1. cleanup for concurrent class unloading"
This just my local mq message.
>
> *) Whitespace missing after "*/" at L453 here:
>
> 452 _workers = new ShenandoahWorkGang("Shenandoah GC Threads", _max_workers,
> 453 /* are_GC_task_threads */true,
> 454 /* are_ConcurrentGC_threads */ true);
>
> *) Better indenting maybe, like this?
>
> assert(!Thread::current()->is_Worker_thread() &&
> (Thread::current()->is_VM_thread() ||
> Thread::current()->is_ConcurrentGC_thread())
Missed another occurrence in shenandoah/shenandoahTimingTracker.cpp
Updated: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8222188/webrev.01/
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
>
> Thanks,
> -Aleksey
>
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list