RFR(T) 8229318: Shenandoah: Assertion failure in nightly test

Zhengyu Gu zgu at redhat.com
Thu Aug 8 15:51:59 UTC 2019


My bad, updated.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.01/

Retesting in progress.

Thanks,

-Zhengyu

On 8/8/19 11:40 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 8/8/19 5:36 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Please review this trivial patch that fixes a bad assertion. The same assertions are coded correctly
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229318
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.00/
> 
> I don't understand.
> 
> There is similar, yet different assert below at L357:
> 
>   354   assert(_index >= 0 && _index <= _size, "Sanity");
>   355
>   356   assert(idx >= 0 && idx < _index, "Out of bound");
>   357   assert(_index > 0 && _index < _size, "Corrupted table");
> 
> Which one is correct?
> 


More information about the shenandoah-dev mailing list