RFR(T) 8229318: Shenandoah: Assertion failure in nightly test
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Thu Aug 8 15:51:59 UTC 2019
My bad, updated.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.01/
Retesting in progress.
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
On 8/8/19 11:40 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 8/8/19 5:36 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Please review this trivial patch that fixes a bad assertion. The same assertions are coded correctly
>> elsewhere.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229318
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8229318/webrev.00/
>
> I don't understand.
>
> There is similar, yet different assert below at L357:
>
> 354 assert(_index >= 0 && _index <= _size, "Sanity");
> 355
> 356 assert(idx >= 0 && idx < _index, "Out of bound");
> 357 assert(_index > 0 && _index < _size, "Corrupted table");
>
> Which one is correct?
>
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list