RFR: 8217874: Shenandoah: AArch64: Clobbered register in ShenandoahBarrierSetAssembler::cmpxchg_oop()

Roman Kennke rkennke at redhat.com
Mon Feb 11 13:16:03 UTC 2019


Hi Andrew,

>>> In AArch64, when called from C2, in
>>> ShenandoahBarrierSetAssembler::cmpxchg_oop() the result register may
>>> overlap with other input argument registers and thus fail the leading
>>> assert, and lead to clobbered registers. In the body of the code block,
>>> a temporary register should be used instead, and result should only get
>>> filled in at the end.
> 
> That looks convincing except that the original code avoided using
> rscratch1. Was there a reason for that?
> 
> It may be that way because the original cmpxchg code that this is
> derived from allowed that callers might be holding something in
> rscratch1 across the cmpxchg call. Will that ever happen for your usage
> in the barrier set?

I believe this is before we used rscratch1 for holding the result in
case of not generating for compare-and-exchange, but this changed with:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/74a5ef4c81cc

> If you are sure that this won't happen and that all the gubbins you call
> from the barrier cmpxchg_oop implementation doesn't use rscratch1 then I
> think this is ok.

Yeah I'm pretty sure.

> Of course, if the result/input overlap is only ever happening in calls
> from C2 then you could fix this more simply in the C2 rules. Allocate a
> temp register in each rule that encodes a call to cmpxchg_oop, pass that
> temp register in as the 'res' argument and then plant a move to the
> output register after the call to cmpxchg_oop.

I thought about that too. But then, why allocate an additional register,
when we can have one for free?

Roman



More information about the shenandoah-dev mailing list