[15] RFR 8228818: Shenandoah: Processing weak roots in concurrent phase when possible
Roman Kennke
rkennke at redhat.com
Wed Jan 8 16:39:25 UTC 2020
Hi Zhengyu,
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahClosures.hpp:
+class ShenandoahEvacUpdateCleanupOopStorageRootsClosure : public
BasicOopIterateClosure {
Why can't this go in shenandoahHeap.cpp (only place where it's used)?
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahControlThread.cpp:
+ // Cleanup/Evacuate weak roots
+ if (heap->marking_context()->is_complete() &&
ShenandoahConcurrentRoots::should_do_concurrent_class_unloading()) {
+ heap->entry_weak_roots();
Are you sure that we only want to do cleanup when we do
conc-class-unloading? Originally, we hoooked this up in the
entry_roots(), why's that not good enough?
src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahRootVerifier.cpp:
What's that change?
- return (_types & type) != 0;
+ return (_types & type) == type;
Thanks,
Roman
> Please review this enhancement that moves some of weak root processing
> into concurrent phase whenever possible.
>
> When concurrent class unloading is enabled, the weak roots that backed
> by OopStorage can be processed in concurrent phase, as Shenandoah native
> LRB can properly resolve the object and hide dead oops from mutators.
>
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8228818
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8228818/webrev.00/
>
> Test:
> hotspot_gc_shenandoah (fastdebug and release)
> on x86_64 and x86_32 Linux
> specjvm on x86_64 Linux
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list