RFR: 8273917: Remove 'leaf' ranking for Mutex [v3]
Coleen Phillimore
coleenp at openjdk.java.net
Tue Oct 5 19:49:14 UTC 2021
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:35:31 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This change removes 'leaf' ranking. The previous change for JDK-8273915 divided the 'leaf' ranked locks that didn't safepoint check into the rank 'nosafepoint', so all the 'leaf' ranking locks left were safepoint_check_always.
>>
>> The rank 'nonleaf' (to be renamed 'safepoint' in the next change) is the *top* mutex rank.
>>
>> The transformation in this change is as follows:
>> nonleaf+n => nonleaf - Generally these 'nonleaf' mutex were top level locks)
>> leaf => nonleaf - Many of these locks were top level locks
>> leaf => nonleaf-2 - Assuming that they were 'leaf' and 2 levels less than some existing nonleaf lock
>> leaf-n => nonleaf-n
>>
>> The new mutex rankings reflect their rankings based on my logging, except for a couple shenandoah locks which I didn't observe, so I made them nonleaf-2.
>>
>> This change also introduces a relative mutex ranking macro, so that a Mutex/Monitor can be defined in terms of a mutex that it holds while trying to acquire it. So these relative mutex are moved to the end of the init function in mutexLocker.cpp.
>>
>> This has been tested with tier1-8, and retesting tier1-3 locally in progress.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Adjust some nonleaf-2 ranks.
Thank you Erik!
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5801
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list