RFR: 8292203: AArch64: Represent Registers as values
Vladimir Kozlov
kvn at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 11 19:52:16 UTC 2022
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:44:50 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov <vlivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:
> (It's a PR dependent on #9815.)
>
> Along with x86 ([JDK-8292153](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292153)), I propose to refactor Register classes on AArch64 and migrate away from pointer-based representation.
>
> The motivation is the same: improve compile-time checks and avoid ambiguities between overloads due to implicit conversions between pointers and integral types.
>
> Proposed change hides pointer representation behind value class.
>
> Pointer-based representation is kept to avoid massive migration of users (from `->` to `.`) and to enable incremental migration on per-platform basis (pointer-based representation is assumed in shared code).
>
> Code quality improves:
> GCC: https://godbolt.org/z/r6G36facj
> Clang: https://godbolt.org/z/x5oPdYEPM
>
> (I noticed one downside: slowdebug builds become slower, because `operator->` isn't inlined there. If it becomes a problem, migrating performance-sensitive places from `->` to `.` should solve the problem.)
>
> Testing: hs-tier1 - hs-tier5
>
> PS: a number of cleanups are incorporated. In particular, I decided to expand all macros from `register.hpp` because IMO they add confusion rather than improve readability.
I looked on aarch64 changes. Looks fine.
The rest come from #9815 as I understand.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by kvn (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9826
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list