RFR: JDK-8301496: Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/riscv [v3]

[Johan Sjölen]

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:49:03 GMT, Johan Sjölen <jsjolen at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi, this PR changes all occurrences of NULL to nullptr for the subdirectory cpu/riscv. Unfortunately the script that does the change isn't perfect, and so we
>> need to comb through these manually to make sure nothing has gone wrong. I also review these changes but things slip past my eyes sometimes.
>> 
>> Here are some typical things to look out for:
>> 
>> 1. No changes but copyright header changed (probably because I reverted some changes but forgot the copyright).
>> 2. Macros having their NULL changed to nullptr, these are added to the script when I find them. They should be NULL.
>> 3. nullptr in comments and logs. We try to use lower case "null" in these cases as it reads better. An exception is made when code expressions are in a comment.
>> 
>> An example of this:
>> 
>> ```c++
>> // This function returns null
>> void* ret_null();
>> // This function returns true if *x == nullptr
>> bool is_nullptr(void** x);
>> 
>> 
>> Note how `nullptr` participates in a code expression here, we really are talking about the specific value `nullptr`.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>
> Johan Sjölen has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
> 
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8301496
>  - Fixes
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8301496
>  - Fixes
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into JDK-8301496
>  -  Replace NULL with nullptr in cpu/riscv

>org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: java.lang.ThreadLocal.set not found!!! ==> expected: <true> but was: <false>

linux-x86 test failure. Probably false alarm, as these changes shouldn't change the behaviour of linux-x86.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12324#issuecomment-1503340680