RFR: JDK-8241503: C2: Share MacroAssembler between mach nodes during code emission
Amit Kumar
amitkumar at openjdk.org
Sat Dec 16 05:05:43 UTC 2023
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 04:34:03 GMT, Amit Kumar <amitkumar at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> # Description
>>
>> Please review this PR with a patch to re-use the same C2_MacroAssembler object to emit all instructions in the same compilation unit.
>>
>> Overall, the change is pretty simple. However, due to the renaming of the variable to access C2_MacroAssembler, from `_masm.` to `masm->`, and also some method prototype changes, the patch became quite large.
>>
>> # Help Needed for Testing
>>
>> I don't have access to all platforms necessary to test this. I hope some other folks can help with testing on `S390`, `RISC-V` and `PPC`.
>>
>> # Testing status
>>
>> ## tier1
>>
>> | | Win | Mac | Linux |
>> |----------|---------|---------|---------|
>> | ARM64 | | ✔ | |
>> | ARM32 | | | |
>> | x86 | | | ✔ |
>> | x64 | | | ✔ |
>> | PPC64 | | | |
>> | S390x | | | |
>> | RiscV | n/a | n/a | ✔ |
>
> `s390x` also run into assert failure: `assert(masm->inst_mark() == nullptr) failed: should be.`
>
>
> V [libjvm.so+0xfb0938] PhaseOutput::fill_buffer(C2_MacroAssembler*, unsigned int*)+0x2370 (output.cpp:1812)
> V [libjvm.so+0xfb21ce] PhaseOutput::Output()+0xcae (output.cpp:362)
> V [libjvm.so+0x6a90a8] Compile::Code_Gen()+0x460 (compile.cpp:2989)
> V [libjvm.so+0x6ad848] Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, Options, DirectiveSet*)+0x1738 (compile.cpp:887)
> V [libjvm.so+0x4fb932] C2Compiler::compile_method(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0x14a (c2compiler.cpp:119)
> V [libjvm.so+0x6b81a2] CompileBroker::invoke_compiler_on_method(CompileTask*)+0xd9a (compileBroker.cpp:2282)
> V [libjvm.so+0x6b8eaa] CompileBroker::compiler_thread_loop()+0x5a2 (compileBroker.cpp:1943)
>@offamitkumar, @TheRealMDoerr - can you please re-run the tests on the platforms convenient for you?
I run build for fastdebug & release VMs and tier1 test for fastdebug VM. Everything seems good.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16484#issuecomment-1858721643
More information about the shenandoah-dev
mailing list